WikiLeaks The recent release of secret dispatches American diplomats-cal, showing, above all, their evaluation of leaders of other countries, the USA more than just embarrassing. (1) this is true also for politicians around the world whose public reputation has been severely shaken. The dispatches can be carefully maintained facades crumble, indicate weaknesses and skill gaps.
course this is only the view of U.S. diplomats.
Many citizens are their estimates surprise of politicians, however, not really. You will see in their own assessments all too often confirmed, even though likely to be only superficially in the rule. You will be pleased to know that politicians such evaluations now even have to take note. How citizens think about their politicians and how they judge their skills are no secret and it is against the background of published U.S. dispatches quite interesting and recommended for politicians, here and not only in WikiLeaks read, as is judged. (2)
The WikiLeaks revelations help to increase the pressure on top politicians. In any case, are in many states because of their policy under massive attack. The numerous protests, whether in Ireland, Greece, Portugal, France, Great Britain or elsewhere to show, as well as opinion polls the vast, furious dissatisfaction of citizens with the services of their government leaders. More and more often, they come together and to initiatives to the somewhat counter-enforce. They do it because they feel abandoned and betrayed. They do it because in their eyes in the political landscape is hardly someone who does not make you suspicious of political patronage, but galubwürdig and unreservedly advocating the common good and proper, rational to be a politician willing and able.
The mediation talks on the dispute over the Stuttgart railway station project "Stuttgart 21", which broadcast on TV and the Internet and from a surprising number of people were persecuted, shows in stark contrast to the now published by WikiLeaks reviews of our leaders that at the regional and local politicians are quite who want and can afford it. Such objectively and competently led, hard debate, as they were seen in the Stuttgart-based mediation talks, there is not in the Bundestag. Bundestag is, so it appears in the direct comparison, "Showtime" - more self-portrayal in the media, more glossy advertising the parties and politicians than anything else. But the fact of how empty the seats are there in the rule, shows that there is not going to debate, but only the position at the lectern is interesting because on the television cameras are directed. Precisely for this reason, the Stuttgart conciliation talks were followed by so many citizens attention. There has delivered what they want. You just do not themselves be staging politician, dodging the question and debate any hard and after her appearance before the cameras at once eyed curious to see how this has affected their approval ratings. They want to know what they really are with their respective leaders.
It is the new release WikiLeaks due to this contrast has been called visible and the problem back into the public consciousness. It is obvious that top political positions all too often just not really appropriate and also enabled politicians to be filled. Without TV cameras they would be worse off.
Links:
(1) American diplomatic reports: secret dispatches reveal the world view the U.S. (v. 28.11.10);
(2) economic policy in crisis: political parties, politicians and business experience (v. 3:08:09), and especially the politicians follow the links to blogs.
(2) Why politicians for economic policy in the crisis not "turn the corner" (v. 05.10.09).