Is Smoking Weed Good For Cataracks

The reversion to small states, or what brings us the ruling of the SNB in terms of horseshoes?

© 2008/Dirk Ludwig

rejected since recently, the Federal Constitutional Court, the new Hufbeschlagsgesetz in part, by the shrill cheers of interested parties hardly an end. Naturally, they benefit as a single and an above-average by the decision. But first things first. Do you know the situation after 30 years of war in Germany a little? No! Then let our consideration of the appeal start with a little time travel.

As in the horseshoe that time the situation was in Germany on the whole, confused and without any binding order. Every little prince or who considered himself something like that could put his own interests over the public interest. Each mini-state had its own laws and taxes, train artisans were as they wanted, because the corporations no longer existed and virtually every village blacksmith shoed horses, even if he had never learned anything like this. The only obligation was largely in the fact that nothing was as authentic. The damage was caused to the horses was immense, causing many contemporaries Goethe's bilious comments.

That these conditions called for a clarification is self Clarification came in the political field as well as in horseshoes, but we want here simply to point out that the situation is not of the horseshoe have been better than the entire political-economic situation both in Germany and no digression into history. The horseshoe itself was lifted only by the power of Graf von Einsiedel and the adoption of mandatory regulations for the country to an acceptable level. Was largely driven by uniform guidelines for scientifically based training for young blacksmiths contributed to the new level in Germany could prevail. Today we have a more complicated situation in the horseshoe and yet she is like that time without liability.

The shrill sounds of rejoicing - they sound like whistling in the dark - are certainly more than justified: They know perfectly well that they have won only against a loveless drafted legislation, not by the persuasive argument, and so we have a further round into the house, that will come because they must. The ruling cements a situation of public transport in Germany, which is similar to those from before Einsiedel work. Everyone can do what he wants, even the absurd hypothesis can be converted into cash. In thirty days to the farrier, testing outside Germany to pay for existing, no problem! The small states have caught up with us, once again created conditions that need clarification ...